z0rk1.eth

#LOLkek #Legal #DeFi #DAO

Scenario: I want to Sue the DAO!

Problem 1: DAO has no function SueMe()
Solution 1: Make SueMe() proposal to DAO to sue DAO and deliver funds to proposal address!

Problem 2: Wait 2 weeks for token holders to vote Yes to being sued.

Problem 3: Asshole token holders voted NO to being sued!
Solution 3: Take over DAO by 51% and vote Yes to being sued.

Problem 4: Huge upward market demand on DAO tokens makes 51% buy in hyper-expensive.
Solution 4: I'm already so rich from suing people in the real world

Problem 5: 49% of ether splits before SueMe() proposal completes.
Problem 6: 100% of remaining ether in DAO is already owned by sole litigant.

Problem 7: DAO tokens now worth nil!
Solution 7: Vote Yes to SueMe() proposal to reclaim a tiny fraction of DAO ether that you already spent trying to buy a 51% attack.

www.tgoop.com/z0rk1_eth/2604

737 viewsz0rk1.eth, edited  Mar 8, 2021 at 08:48

#LOLkek #Legal #DeFi #DAO

Scenario: I want to Sue the DAO!

Problem 1: DAO has no function SueMe()
Solution 1: Make SueMe() proposal to DAO to sue DAO and deliver funds to proposal address!

Problem 2: Wait 2 weeks for token holders to vote Yes to being sued.

Problem 3: Asshole token holders voted NO to being sued!
Solution 3: Take over DAO by 51% and vote Yes to being sued.

Problem 4: Huge upward market demand on DAO tokens makes 51% buy in hyper-expensive.
Solution 4: I'm already so rich from suing people in the real world

Problem 5: 49% of ether splits before SueMe() proposal completes.
Problem 6: 100% of remaining ether in DAO is already owned by sole litigant.

Problem 7: DAO tokens now worth nil!
Solution 7: Vote Yes to SueMe() proposal to reclaim a tiny fraction of DAO ether that you already spent trying to buy a 51% attack.

BY z0rk1.eth