Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8120 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/tgoop/post.php on line 50

Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 8192 of 16312 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/tgoop/post.php on line 50
Tool Building Ape × Gleb Kalinin@toolusing P.170
TOOLUSING Telegram 170
Voice is not just another input method; it’s a shift in sensorial dominance. Screens extend our eyes, voice extends our nervous system through the ear, reactivating ancient pathways of cognition and interaction.

A voice interface, especially one we wear like Plaud AI Pin, becomes an acoustic skin — intimate, participatory, and ambient, embodied.

Voice doesn’t just help us access the machine. It helps the machine access our attention ecology.

Walter Ong contrasted written and oral cultures: writing is linear, abstract, and objectified. Orality, by contrast, is additive, empathic, and dynamic, deeply humane. Voice interfaces return us to real-time cognition, fluid memory, and dialogic logic. No more file, no more computers — you summon a ghost of what matters with a word, a sentence, a prompt.

Speaking is not just easier — it’s cognitively older.
It’s how we think when we’re not trying to look smart.

Albert B. Lord, in The Singer of Tales (1960), studied oral poets in the Balkans who could improvise entire epics without writing them down. They did it by mastering formulaic structures and adaptive recall — not by memorizing, but by re-composing in performance. Voice interfaces today offer a similar possibility:
You don’t recall. You reformulate. You co-create with the AI, much like a bard with a responsive lyre.

We are no longer writers.
We are singers of prompts.

I
believe we are witnessing the end of literacy as we knew it for a few hundred years. We are transitioning to a new age of post-literacy. People who have previous formal literacy skills might benefit from this transition the most.
🔥1



tgoop.com/toolusing/170
Create:
Last Update:

Voice is not just another input method; it’s a shift in sensorial dominance. Screens extend our eyes, voice extends our nervous system through the ear, reactivating ancient pathways of cognition and interaction.

A voice interface, especially one we wear like Plaud AI Pin, becomes an acoustic skin — intimate, participatory, and ambient, embodied.

Voice doesn’t just help us access the machine. It helps the machine access our attention ecology.

Walter Ong contrasted written and oral cultures: writing is linear, abstract, and objectified. Orality, by contrast, is additive, empathic, and dynamic, deeply humane. Voice interfaces return us to real-time cognition, fluid memory, and dialogic logic. No more file, no more computers — you summon a ghost of what matters with a word, a sentence, a prompt.

Speaking is not just easier — it’s cognitively older.
It’s how we think when we’re not trying to look smart.

Albert B. Lord, in The Singer of Tales (1960), studied oral poets in the Balkans who could improvise entire epics without writing them down. They did it by mastering formulaic structures and adaptive recall — not by memorizing, but by re-composing in performance. Voice interfaces today offer a similar possibility:
You don’t recall. You reformulate. You co-create with the AI, much like a bard with a responsive lyre.

We are no longer writers.
We are singers of prompts.

I
believe we are witnessing the end of literacy as we knew it for a few hundred years. We are transitioning to a new age of post-literacy. People who have previous formal literacy skills might benefit from this transition the most.

BY Tool Building Ape × Gleb Kalinin


Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/toolusing/170

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram News

Date: |

best-secure-messaging-apps-shutterstock-1892950018.jpg fire bomb molotov November 18 Dylan Hollingsworth yau ma tei Read now Joined by Telegram's representative in Brazil, Alan Campos, Perekopsky noted the platform was unable to cater to some of the TSE requests due to the company's operational setup. But Perekopsky added that these requests could be studied for future implementation. Among the requests, the Brazilian electoral Court wanted to know if they could obtain data on the origins of malicious content posted on the platform. According to the TSE, this would enable the authorities to track false content and identify the user responsible for publishing it in the first place.
from us


Telegram Tool Building Ape × Gleb Kalinin
FROM American