I am Officially a Campaign Hostage. I mean, we all knew that already, but it's beyond official. It's an irrefutable fact.
I heard from Cynthia today, my Motion for Immediate Release was denied. It's not for a lack of precedent. It's not because I haven't served my time. It's not for behavioral issues. It's not because the recent Supreme Court ruling on the 1512 doesn't apply to me. It's none of those things. It's only because the Biden/Harris Department of Justice does not want to let me go home, and Judge Mehta doesn't want to be the one to do it. That's it. The people who beat cops with flagpoles on January 6th were arrested after me, sentenced to 3-4 years, did their time, already went to a halfway house, and are now home. I harmed no one. I was foolish enough to walk through an open door and be "in the way" for 24 minutes. I rescued the injured and stopped vandalism while doing so. And yet, I am still here, while "violent" J6ers are home with their loved ones. Make it make sense. Can't do it? Neither can I, and I am sitting here with a calculator. Let's do some math.
The Immediate Release motion my attorney filed was unequivocal. I have served entirely too much time. That Judge Mehta had over-sentenced me with inapplicable enhancements; that additionally, in light of the Fischer v. United States decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that my behaviors did not constitute a 1512 Charge. The Government, in their reply, didn't refute that. This means that they know the 1512 and Conspiracy Charges are going away. They don't even seem to be fighting it. That leaves me with only ONE Felony (and no misdemeanors). I would only have "Impeding Officers Responding to a Civil Disorder". It's a maximum of 5 years (60 Months). But in the Government's reply, they stated that they believe they can squeeze a 51-71 month sentence out of me somehow. So, Judge Mehta clicked his heels and said "OK then", and promptly denied my Motion. But that's not the fulsome picture. No. There's a LOT to be considered, even from the Government's Motion.
Let's start with the fact that I have currently served 44 Months. That's the baseline to consider. I have spent almost 4 years in prison.
So, according to the Government's own Motion, if Judge Mehta actually sentenced me to the full amount between 51 and 71 months, that would invalidate the 40% downward variance he had applied at my previous sentencing. There's no precedent to do so. He had many reasons for his downward variances; being a combat veteran, turning myself in to the authorities, cooperating in the investigation, preserving evidence, severe childhood trauma, etc. The guidelines for my original sentence brought me to a Level 33 and a sentence of 168 Months. With the aforementioned downward variances, he sentenced me to 102 Months, instead of the 168 Months. So, that means, he looked at my history and said "OK, well, there's some other things going on here. I won't give her the full amount". Makes sense, right? So, he looked at my past, mitigating factors and such, and he sentenced me to 102 Months on a Federal Guideline of 168. That is a 39.3% downward variance.
I will say it again. The Statutory Maximum for "Impeding Officers Responding to Civil Disorder" is 5 Years. 60 Months. That's what the law says that the MAXIMUM is. I am a 0 Point Offender, with no Criminal History. Not even a parking ticket. I would likely not be sentenced under the maximum, even for a J6 Offense. But for shits and giggles, let's say I did. 71 Months exceeds the Statute by 11 months, but I will calculate for the 71 months too.
-A 39.3% downward variance on 51 Months is 31 Months. I have been in prison for 44 Months. Over a year too much. -A 39.3% downward variance on 60 Months is 36.4 Months. I have been in prison for 3.6 Months too much -A 39.3% downward variance on 71 Months is 43.1 Months. I have been in prison for 1 Month too much.
So even based on the Government's OWN Motion, I would have had Time Served and gone home LONG ago. Certainly NOW.
I am Officially a Campaign Hostage. I mean, we all knew that already, but it's beyond official. It's an irrefutable fact.
I heard from Cynthia today, my Motion for Immediate Release was denied. It's not for a lack of precedent. It's not because I haven't served my time. It's not for behavioral issues. It's not because the recent Supreme Court ruling on the 1512 doesn't apply to me. It's none of those things. It's only because the Biden/Harris Department of Justice does not want to let me go home, and Judge Mehta doesn't want to be the one to do it. That's it. The people who beat cops with flagpoles on January 6th were arrested after me, sentenced to 3-4 years, did their time, already went to a halfway house, and are now home. I harmed no one. I was foolish enough to walk through an open door and be "in the way" for 24 minutes. I rescued the injured and stopped vandalism while doing so. And yet, I am still here, while "violent" J6ers are home with their loved ones. Make it make sense. Can't do it? Neither can I, and I am sitting here with a calculator. Let's do some math.
The Immediate Release motion my attorney filed was unequivocal. I have served entirely too much time. That Judge Mehta had over-sentenced me with inapplicable enhancements; that additionally, in light of the Fischer v. United States decision, the Supreme Court has ruled that my behaviors did not constitute a 1512 Charge. The Government, in their reply, didn't refute that. This means that they know the 1512 and Conspiracy Charges are going away. They don't even seem to be fighting it. That leaves me with only ONE Felony (and no misdemeanors). I would only have "Impeding Officers Responding to a Civil Disorder". It's a maximum of 5 years (60 Months). But in the Government's reply, they stated that they believe they can squeeze a 51-71 month sentence out of me somehow. So, Judge Mehta clicked his heels and said "OK then", and promptly denied my Motion. But that's not the fulsome picture. No. There's a LOT to be considered, even from the Government's Motion.
Let's start with the fact that I have currently served 44 Months. That's the baseline to consider. I have spent almost 4 years in prison.
So, according to the Government's own Motion, if Judge Mehta actually sentenced me to the full amount between 51 and 71 months, that would invalidate the 40% downward variance he had applied at my previous sentencing. There's no precedent to do so. He had many reasons for his downward variances; being a combat veteran, turning myself in to the authorities, cooperating in the investigation, preserving evidence, severe childhood trauma, etc. The guidelines for my original sentence brought me to a Level 33 and a sentence of 168 Months. With the aforementioned downward variances, he sentenced me to 102 Months, instead of the 168 Months. So, that means, he looked at my history and said "OK, well, there's some other things going on here. I won't give her the full amount". Makes sense, right? So, he looked at my past, mitigating factors and such, and he sentenced me to 102 Months on a Federal Guideline of 168. That is a 39.3% downward variance.
I will say it again. The Statutory Maximum for "Impeding Officers Responding to Civil Disorder" is 5 Years. 60 Months. That's what the law says that the MAXIMUM is. I am a 0 Point Offender, with no Criminal History. Not even a parking ticket. I would likely not be sentenced under the maximum, even for a J6 Offense. But for shits and giggles, let's say I did. 71 Months exceeds the Statute by 11 months, but I will calculate for the 71 months too.
-A 39.3% downward variance on 51 Months is 31 Months. I have been in prison for 44 Months. Over a year too much. -A 39.3% downward variance on 60 Months is 36.4 Months. I have been in prison for 3.6 Months too much -A 39.3% downward variance on 71 Months is 43.1 Months. I have been in prison for 1 Month too much.
So even based on the Government's OWN Motion, I would have had Time Served and gone home LONG ago. Certainly NOW.
As the broader market downturn continues, yelling online has become the crypto trader’s latest coping mechanism after the rise of Goblintown Ethereum NFTs at the end of May and beginning of June, where holders made incoherent groaning sounds and role-played as urine-loving goblin creatures in late-night Twitter Spaces. A Telegram channel is used for various purposes, from sharing helpful content to implementing a business strategy. In addition, you can use your channel to build and improve your company image, boost your sales, make profits, enhance customer loyalty, and more. Telegram Channels requirements & features To upload a logo, click the Menu icon and select “Manage Channel.” In a new window, hit the Camera icon. With Bitcoin down 30% in the past week, some crypto traders have taken to Telegram to “voice” their feelings.
from us
