IOTA

“Playing with Time: What Is the Real Goal of the Islamic Republic in the Nuclear Talks?”
✍️ Analysis by Masoud Nejati
– IOTA Companions

At first glance, it may seem that the Islamic Republic in Iran, like other members of international treaties, is seeking a stable and trustworthy agreement with the global community. But a closer look at historical trends, political developments, and the timelines in the JCPOA reveals a different story.

The “snapback mechanism” — a legal tool to restore sanctions in case of Iranian violations — remains in place until October 18, 2025. On the surface, this maintains pressure. But in reality, Iran only needs to buy time until then. After that date, the automatic reactivation of sanctions by the UN Security Council will effectively expire.

Furthermore, key technical restrictions on Iran’s access to advanced nuclear technology will begin to lift from January 2026. This marks the official end of many of the technical roadblocks that have delayed potential bomb production.

Even more strategically important: the U.S. midterm elections in November 2026. The regime’s tactic is to prolong negotiations and avoid meaningful agreements until a moment when both snapback pressure and U.S. leverage are weakened — tipping the balance in Iran’s favor.

This is not a peaceful program, but a strategic threshold posture, where Iran flaunts the capability to build a bomb rapidly, North Korea–style, without necessarily building one.

Such positioning enhances Iran’s geopolitical weight and empowers internal repression. When global pressure fades, the regime can silence domestic dissent more freely. Nuclear capacity, even as a threat, becomes a shield — both abroad and at home.

In this complex game, the goal is not peace, nor sanctions relief, but regime survival with impunity.

According to Mr. Nejati, the only path to long-term regional stability and freedom in Iran is supporting a secular, nationalist, and peaceful alternative: Prince Reza Pahlavi.

⸻

“The IOTA Perspective: Beyond Conflict Lies a Third Path”
IOTA does not see itself in the chessboard of military power. We are not here to take sides in a war of governments — but to redefine trust through decentralized, transparent systems built on DLT and smart contracts.

We agree that global power structures are shifting. But replacing one empire with another isn’t the answer.
The future we see isn’t about dominance. It’s about distributed intelligence, interconnected creativity, and technological synergy.

IOTA is not opposition. IOTA is not establishment.
We are the third path — the energy of Mithra, the force of synergy.

#IOTA #IOTACompanions #NewGeopolitics #IranTransition #Web3 #BRICS #PeaceTech #FutureIsDistributed

https://www.tgoop.com/IOTASDC

Telegram

IOTA

Welcome to IOTA! We empower entrepreneurs with holistic mentorship and support for a sustainable future. Join us to connect and grow! 🌍🚀Www.IOTAsustainable.com
IOTA "Empowering Entrepreneurs, Building a Sustainable Future."

www.tgoop.com/IOTASDC/289

25 viewsApr 21 at 16:42

“Playing with Time: What Is the Real Goal of the Islamic Republic in the Nuclear Talks?”
✍️ Analysis by Masoud Nejati
– IOTA Companions

At first glance, it may seem that the Islamic Republic in Iran, like other members of international treaties, is seeking a stable and trustworthy agreement with the global community. But a closer look at historical trends, political developments, and the timelines in the JCPOA reveals a different story.

The “snapback mechanism” — a legal tool to restore sanctions in case of Iranian violations — remains in place until October 18, 2025. On the surface, this maintains pressure. But in reality, Iran only needs to buy time until then. After that date, the automatic reactivation of sanctions by the UN Security Council will effectively expire.

Furthermore, key technical restrictions on Iran’s access to advanced nuclear technology will begin to lift from January 2026. This marks the official end of many of the technical roadblocks that have delayed potential bomb production.

Even more strategically important: the U.S. midterm elections in November 2026. The regime’s tactic is to prolong negotiations and avoid meaningful agreements until a moment when both snapback pressure and U.S. leverage are weakened — tipping the balance in Iran’s favor.

This is not a peaceful program, but a strategic threshold posture, where Iran flaunts the capability to build a bomb rapidly, North Korea–style, without necessarily building one.

Such positioning enhances Iran’s geopolitical weight and empowers internal repression. When global pressure fades, the regime can silence domestic dissent more freely. Nuclear capacity, even as a threat, becomes a shield — both abroad and at home.

In this complex game, the goal is not peace, nor sanctions relief, but regime survival with impunity.

According to Mr. Nejati, the only path to long-term regional stability and freedom in Iran is supporting a secular, nationalist, and peaceful alternative: Prince Reza Pahlavi.

⸻

“The IOTA Perspective: Beyond Conflict Lies a Third Path”
IOTA does not see itself in the chessboard of military power. We are not here to take sides in a war of governments — but to redefine trust through decentralized, transparent systems built on DLT and smart contracts.

We agree that global power structures are shifting. But replacing one empire with another isn’t the answer.
The future we see isn’t about dominance. It’s about distributed intelligence, interconnected creativity, and technological synergy.

IOTA is not opposition. IOTA is not establishment.
We are the third path — the energy of Mithra, the force of synergy.

#IOTA #IOTACompanions #NewGeopolitics #IranTransition #Web3 #BRICS #PeaceTech #FutureIsDistributed

https://www.tgoop.com/IOTASDC

BY IOTA