Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/tgoop/post.php on line 37
Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS/--): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/tgoop/post.php on line 50 βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€@CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS P.3667
22. Everything is either a mind, or a mental content, or a material entity, or an abstract entity. 23. An abstract entity is causally inert. 24. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, since it is not causally inert, is not an abstract entity. 25. A material entity has parts and is changeable. 26. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, since it is without parts and changeless, is not a material entity. 27. A mental content presupposes the existence of a mind, and so cannot be the ultimate cause of anything. 28. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, being the ultimate cause of things, cannot be a mental content. 29. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause must be a mind. 30. Since the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause is unique, everything other than it is composite. 31. Every composite has the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause as its ultimate cause. 32. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause is the ultimate cause of everything other than itself. 33. If the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause had potentialities as well as actualities, it would have parts
βThe Neo-Platonic proof for the existence of God
Part 3
34. So, since it has no parts, it must have no potentialities but be purely actual. 35. A purely actual cause must be perfect, omnipotent, fully good, and omniscient. 36. So, there exists a cause which is simple or noncomposite, unique, immutable, eternal, immaterial, a mind or intellect, the uncaused ultimate cause of everything other than itself, purely actual, perfect, omnipotent, fully good, and omniscient. 37. But for there to be such a cause is just what it is for God to exist. 38. So, God exists.
β The Augustinian Proof for the Existence of God:
Part 1:
1. There are three possible accounts of abstract objects such as universals, propositions, numbers and other mathematical objects, and possible worlds: realism, nominalism, and conceptualism. 2. There are decisive arguments in favor of realism. 3. There are insuperable objections against nominalism. 4. There are insuperable objections against conceptualism. 5. So, some version of realism is true. 6. There are three possible versions of realism: Platonic realism, Aristotelian realism, and Scholastic realism. 7. If Platonic realism is true, then abstract objects exist in a "third realm" distinct from either the material world or any intellect. 8. If Aristotelian realism is true, then abstract objects exist only in human or other contingently existing intellects. 9. If Scholastic realism is true, then abstract objects exist not only in contingently existing intellects but also in at least one necessarily existing intellect. 10. There are insuperable objections against the claim that abstract objects exist in a "third realm" distinct from either the material world or any intellect. 11. So, Platonic realism is not true. 12. There are insuperable objections against the claim that abstract objects exist only in human or other contingently existing intellects. 13. So, Aristotelian realism is not true. 14. So, Scholastic realism is true. 15. So, abstract objects exist not only in contingently existing intellects but also in at least one necessarily existing intellect. 16. Abstract objects such as universals, propositions, numbers and other mathematical objects, and possible worlds are all logically related to one another in such a way that they form an interlocking system of ideas to one another in such a way that they form an interlocking system of ideas.
β The Augustinian Proof for the Existence of God:
Part 2:
17. The reasons for concluding that at least some abstract objects exist in a necessarily existing intellect also entail that this interlocking system of ideas must exist in a necessarily existing intellect.
22. Everything is either a mind, or a mental content, or a material entity, or an abstract entity. 23. An abstract entity is causally inert. 24. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, since it is not causally inert, is not an abstract entity. 25. A material entity has parts and is changeable. 26. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, since it is without parts and changeless, is not a material entity. 27. A mental content presupposes the existence of a mind, and so cannot be the ultimate cause of anything. 28. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause, being the ultimate cause of things, cannot be a mental content. 29. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause must be a mind. 30. Since the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause is unique, everything other than it is composite. 31. Every composite has the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause as its ultimate cause. 32. So, the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause is the ultimate cause of everything other than itself. 33. If the absolutely simple or noncomposite cause had potentialities as well as actualities, it would have parts
βThe Neo-Platonic proof for the existence of God
Part 3
34. So, since it has no parts, it must have no potentialities but be purely actual. 35. A purely actual cause must be perfect, omnipotent, fully good, and omniscient. 36. So, there exists a cause which is simple or noncomposite, unique, immutable, eternal, immaterial, a mind or intellect, the uncaused ultimate cause of everything other than itself, purely actual, perfect, omnipotent, fully good, and omniscient. 37. But for there to be such a cause is just what it is for God to exist. 38. So, God exists.
β The Augustinian Proof for the Existence of God:
Part 1:
1. There are three possible accounts of abstract objects such as universals, propositions, numbers and other mathematical objects, and possible worlds: realism, nominalism, and conceptualism. 2. There are decisive arguments in favor of realism. 3. There are insuperable objections against nominalism. 4. There are insuperable objections against conceptualism. 5. So, some version of realism is true. 6. There are three possible versions of realism: Platonic realism, Aristotelian realism, and Scholastic realism. 7. If Platonic realism is true, then abstract objects exist in a "third realm" distinct from either the material world or any intellect. 8. If Aristotelian realism is true, then abstract objects exist only in human or other contingently existing intellects. 9. If Scholastic realism is true, then abstract objects exist not only in contingently existing intellects but also in at least one necessarily existing intellect. 10. There are insuperable objections against the claim that abstract objects exist in a "third realm" distinct from either the material world or any intellect. 11. So, Platonic realism is not true. 12. There are insuperable objections against the claim that abstract objects exist only in human or other contingently existing intellects. 13. So, Aristotelian realism is not true. 14. So, Scholastic realism is true. 15. So, abstract objects exist not only in contingently existing intellects but also in at least one necessarily existing intellect. 16. Abstract objects such as universals, propositions, numbers and other mathematical objects, and possible worlds are all logically related to one another in such a way that they form an interlocking system of ideas to one another in such a way that they form an interlocking system of ideas.
β The Augustinian Proof for the Existence of God:
Part 2:
17. The reasons for concluding that at least some abstract objects exist in a necessarily existing intellect also entail that this interlocking system of ideas must exist in a necessarily existing intellect.
BY βππ₯ππ πππ πΈπ‘π ππ πππ₯πππ€ πππ βπ ππππππ€
Judge Hui described Ng as inciting others to βcommit a massacreβ with three posts teaching people to make βtoxic chlorine gas bombs,β target police stations, police quarters and the cityβs metro stations. This offence was βrather serious,β the court said. There have been several contributions to the group with members posting voice notes of screaming, yelling, groaning, and wailing in different rhythms and pitches. Calling out the βdegenerateβ community or the crypto obsessives that engage in high-risk trading, Co-founder of NFT renting protocol Rentable World emiliano.eth shared this group on his Twitter. He wrote: βhey degen, are you stressed? Just let it out all out. Voice only tg channel for screamingβ. Concise Members can post their voice notes of themselves screaming. Interestingly, the group doesnβt allow to post anything else which might lead to an instant ban. As of now, there are more than 330 members in the group. Find your optimal posting schedule and stick to it. The peak posting times include 8 am, 6 pm, and 8 pm on social media. Try to publish serious stuff in the morning and leave less demanding content later in the day.
from us
