tgoop.com/BitCoinSourceForge/127
Last Update:
Cobbie fails to realise that the whitepaper was not in the same Sourceforge file and folder as the license.
More importantly, MIT licensing covers source code.
The PDF is not source code. But the simple part is the research paper is in a separate folder without any license.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091127010808/http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/
Notice - separate directories and NO license on the Wp
https://web.archive.org/web/20091128183828/http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=640697
No license in the Paper folder.
As author - I have copyright
I have also registereed.
The registration in the US is only a preclude to court action.
This is what people don't seem to understand. The people falsely filing saying that they wrote the whitepaper now have to defend. If they cannot, they either have to admit that they committed intentional fraud and falsified the filing or commit perjury in court.
They need to prove they created the whitepaper and the code if they want to defend. If they do not, that is they don't prove, then they could end up in prison
I fail to understand why people think that I work to their timetable.
The simple fact is I'm willing to take two years or more to put everything into place properly.
I am highly rational and incredibly detailed in calculating
I did note these in 2017...
CSW
Jan 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611221252079200?thread_t
https://www.tgoop.com/CSW_Slack/2447
BY 2008 361 BitCoin SourceForge.net
Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/BitCoinSourceForge/127