tgoop.com/AbuHaatimEn/1414
Last Update:
The eighth matter: The extent of the effect of time and place in labelling the ignorant of Tawheed as Mushrik.
I say, whilst seeking aid with Allah:
▪️The fact that ruling of those that worship other than Allah, from those that are ignorant of Tawheed, differing in what relates to - their ruling in the Dunya and the Aakhirah, outwardly and inwardly - in accordance to their conditions and their times and their places, but this doesn't change the application of the title of Shirk and apparent disbelief upon them in the worldly life due to what they have manifested of clear major Shirk which makes a person not able to establish Islaam due to perpetrating it, even if they were ignorant, due to departure of the basis of Tawheed due to the presence of major Shirk, as the clarification of this has preceded recently, in the first volume at the speech on the topic of (the connection of The Excuse of Ignorance to the subject matter of names and titles).
And whilst this is clear, there is the presence of those that claim that the lack of excuse in what relates to applying the title of Mushrik on those that worship other than Allah is only in the lands of Sa'udiyyah which Tawheed is widespread therein, contrary to Misr and Yemen and other countries which Shirk is prevalent therein.
▪️We in the first volume have relayed the consensus of the people of knowledge, from more than one of the Imams, like Ibn-Ul-Qayyim, and Ishaaq bin Abdirrahman bin Hassan, may Allah have mercy upon them all, on the applying the title of Mushrik and outward Disbeliever, on the ignorant of Tawheed - those that worship other than Allah:
- Regardless if they were from those who are from the people of Al-Fatrah.
- Or those who ignorant and blind-followers and others, in this Ummah or other than it, who take their ruling.
In the clarification of this - also - the Allaamah Abdulmuhsin Al-Abbaad, may Allah preserve him,said in his treatise <Al-Iydaah wat-Tibyeen...> said: "What becomes clear through what has preceded is that there is a difference:
- Between the disbelief of those the evidences where established upon, and that the end result of those of this kind are the hellfire and eternal dwelling therein.
- And between the Disbelief of those that the evidences weren't established upon its perpetrators, like the Disbelief of the people of Al-Fatrah, and those that take their ruling from those who grew up on going out of bounds regarding the righteous and beseeching them, not knowing Islam except to be this action, taken those that resemble scholars who misguided them as examples, then their affair is to Allah, He will test them on the day of Judgement and the end result of some of them after being tested will be Jannah, and some of them will be to the fire". End of speech.
▪️We have already relayed the establishments of the scholars of the "Standing committee of legal rulings" with Imam Ibn Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, as its head, in their Fataawa <first group> (2/147 and what comes after it) they mentioned a number of scenarios of those that perform major Shirk, where they mentioned:
A. That those from amongst them who have the evidences established upon them.
B. And those from amongst them who live in the lands of the Muslims.
C. And those that live in non Muslim lands and the Da'wah didn't reach them.
Whilst the fact that their ruling differs but they didn't establish for all of them the title Muslim, due to them committing the greatest opposite and nullifier, and this is Shirk, so they are missing the greatest affair which brings about for them the title Muslim, which is Tawheed.
[Page 32]
BY The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al-'Inaabi Al-Jazaa'iree
Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/AbuHaatimEn/1414