tgoop.com/AbuHaatimEn/1381
Last Update:
The notification has preceded in the first volume on the difference between the affairs of obscured disbelief in this subject matter, like in what has preceded, and between the affairs which are clearcut and known from the religion by necessity, and at the forefront of this is major Shirk with Allah, and rejection of the Message, as the religion is established upon this, because if one of these affairs is found a person doesn't have anything of Islam, and ignorance and misinterpretation and other than this doesn't come into this, as major Shirk is exiting from the religion of Allah and entering into the religion of the Idol worshippers.
Contrary to if a person had the amount of which sufficed of the basis of Tawheed of Allah, and the basis of the following of the Messenger, and then fell into some of the things of one could be declared a Disbeliever; of the things which can go obscured, and then the evidences of the Message didn't reach them, without them being negligent or turning away, then this one isn't made Takfeer of, except after the establishment of the evidences upon them.
▪️This has been implemented by many of the scholars of the religion, from them:
1. The Imam, the second Mujadid, Abdurrahman bin Hassan, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: "The scholars may Allah have mercy upon them tread upon the path of uprightness, and mentioned the chapter of the ruling of the apostate, and not one of them said that if one stated disbelief or performed disbelief, whilst not knowing that it opposed the two testifications, that they don't disbelieve due to their ignorance.
Allah has clarified in His Book that some of the Mushriks were ignorant and blind-followers, their ignorance and blind-following didn't ward away the punishment of Allah, as the most high said:
(وَمِنَ ٱلنَّاسِ مَن يُجَٰدِلُ فِى ٱللَّهِ بِغَيْرِ عِلْمٍ وَيَتَّبِعُ كُلَّ شَيْطَٰنٍ مَّرِيدٍ)
"And of the people is he who disputes about Allah without knowledge and follows every rebellious devil".
[Al-Hajj:3]
Until His statement:
(إِلَىٰ عَذَابِ ٱلسَّعِيرِ)
"will lead him to the punishment of the Blaze".
[Al-Hajj:4]
End of speech.
2. 3. 4. The major scholars: Abdullah and Ibraheem the two sons of Abdullateef bin Abdirrahman, and Suleiman bin Sahmaan, may Allah have mercy upon them all, whereby they said: "Similarly the grave worshippers there is no doubt regarding their disbelief with those smelt the smell of Eemaan, and Shaykh-Ul-Islaam and his student Ibn-Ul-Qayyim have stated in more than one place, that the negation of Takfeer in affairs of statements and actions which one is declared a Disbeliever for, is in what the evidences are obscured in, and the evidences haven't been established upon those that perpetrated it, and that what is intended in the negation is the negating the Takfeer of the perpetrator and their punishment before the establishment of the evidences upon them, and negating the Takfeer is specific to subject matters of differing between the Ummah.
As for the supplicating to the righteous and beseeching them, and directing towards them in difficulty and distress, here a muslim doesn't differ in its impermissibility, and ruling upon it that it's from major Shirk, so there isn't two positions on their Takfeer nor on the Takfeer of the Jahmiyyah". <Ad-Durar As-Sanniyyah> (4/409).
5. The Allaamah, the Mufti, Abdullah AbaButayn, may Allah have mercy upon him, said in clarification of what Shaykh-Ul-Islaam established in this subject matter: "His speech, may Allah have mercy upon him, points to that he considers the understanding of the evidences to be in the affairs which could go obscured upon many of the people, and doesn't contain therein invalidation of Tawheed and the Message, like ignorance in some attributes.
BY The Official English Channel of Shaykh Abu Hatim Yusuf Al-'Inaabi Al-Jazaa'iree
Share with your friend now:
tgoop.com/AbuHaatimEn/1381