Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Appellate Tribunal is defined under β
Anonymous Quiz
19%
a. Section 2(1) of Companies Act, 2013
39%
b. Section 2(2) of Companies Act, 2013
28%
c. Section 2(3) of Companies Act, 2013
14%
d. Section 2(4) of Companies Act, 2013
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Appellate Tribunal means β
Anonymous Quiz
15%
a. Law Appellate Tribunal
14%
b. Company Law Appellate Tribunal
21%
c. National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
50%
d. Both (b) and (c)
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Appellate Tribunal means the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal constituted under β
Anonymous Quiz
25%
a. Section 110 of Companies Act, 2013
43%
b. Section 210 of Companies Act, 2013
24%
c. Section 310 of Companies Act, 2013
8%
d. Section 410 of Companies Act, 2013
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Associate company is defined under β
Anonymous Quiz
23%
a. Section 2(5) of Companies Act, 2013
41%
b. Section 2(6) of Companies Act, 2013
27%
c. Section 2(7) of Companies Act, 2013
8%
d. Section 2(8) of Companies Act, 2013
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
What is Section 1 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Anonymous Quiz
32%
a. Short title
10%
b. Extent, Commencement
3%
c. Saving
54%
d. All of the above
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Which of the following is not a form of abetment under BNS, 2023?
Anonymous Quiz
9%
A) Instigation
17%
B) Conspiracy
65%
C) Harboring
9%
D) Aiding
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
π Abetment of a Thing under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
βοΈ Statutory Provision
The concept of abetment is covered under Chapter 4 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, specifically from Sections 44 to 48.
π§© Section 44 β Abetment of a Thing
"A person abets the doing of a thing, whoβ
(a) instigates any person to do that thing; or
(b) engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
(c) intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing."
This provision defines the concept of abetment β when a person is said to abet the commission of an offense or any illegal act.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Key Interpretations
Instigation can be direct or indirect (e.g., through words, gestures, or writing).
Conspiracy alone is not sufficient unless some act or omission is done to further the object of the conspiracy.
Aiding includes both positive acts and deliberate omissions (e.g., not alerting police when duty-bound to do so).
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Illustration from BNS or IPC Case Law (applicable to BNS as well)
R v. Mohit Sharma: A person who provided the weapon used in a robbery, knowing the purpose, was held guilty of abetment by aiding.
Sajan Kumar v. State: Inciting a mob through speeches led to conviction under abetment by instigation.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
βοΈ Punishment for Abetment (BNS Sections 47β48)
Section 47: If the act abetted is committed, abettor gets same punishment as principal offender.
Section 48: If the act is not committed, punishment depends on the nature of the abetted offense (up to 7 years + fine).
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Summary
Abetment under BNS includes instigation, conspiracy, and aiding.
It applies even if the offense is not completed.
Liability is based on intention and active involvement.
Punishment depends on whether the offense is actually committed or not.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
βοΈ Statutory Provision
The concept of abetment is covered under Chapter 4 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, specifically from Sections 44 to 48.
π§© Section 44 β Abetment of a Thing
"A person abets the doing of a thing, whoβ
(a) instigates any person to do that thing; or
(b) engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for the doing of that thing, if an act or illegal omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or
(c) intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing."
This provision defines the concept of abetment β when a person is said to abet the commission of an offense or any illegal act.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Key Interpretations
Instigation can be direct or indirect (e.g., through words, gestures, or writing).
Conspiracy alone is not sufficient unless some act or omission is done to further the object of the conspiracy.
Aiding includes both positive acts and deliberate omissions (e.g., not alerting police when duty-bound to do so).
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Illustration from BNS or IPC Case Law (applicable to BNS as well)
R v. Mohit Sharma: A person who provided the weapon used in a robbery, knowing the purpose, was held guilty of abetment by aiding.
Sajan Kumar v. State: Inciting a mob through speeches led to conviction under abetment by instigation.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
βοΈ Punishment for Abetment (BNS Sections 47β48)
Section 47: If the act abetted is committed, abettor gets same punishment as principal offender.
Section 48: If the act is not committed, punishment depends on the nature of the abetted offense (up to 7 years + fine).
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Summary
Abetment under BNS includes instigation, conspiracy, and aiding.
It applies even if the offense is not completed.
Liability is based on intention and active involvement.
Punishment depends on whether the offense is actually committed or not.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Abetment under Section 45 includes:
Anonymous Quiz
7%
A) Instigating a person
10%
B) Engaging in conspiracy
4%
C) Intentionally aiding
80%
D) All of the above
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Which Section in the Indian Contract Act, 1872 is interpretation clause?
Anonymous Quiz
12%
a. Section 1
64%
b. Section 2
20%
c. Section 3
4%
d. Section 4
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
To constitute abetment by conspiracy under BNS, what is required?
Anonymous Quiz
5%
A) A secret agreement
6%
B) A public declaration
77%
C) An act or illegal omission in pursuance of the conspiracy
12%
D) All conspirators living in the same state
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
π§Ύ Criminal Conspiracy β Scope and Punishment under BNS, 2023
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π What is Criminal Conspiracy?
Under Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, criminal conspiracy is defined as:
βWhen two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done β
(a) an illegal act, or
(b) a legal act by illegal means,
such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy.β
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
πΈ Key Point: Mere agreement is enough in serious offenses β no act needs to be committed to complete the offense of conspiracy.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
βοΈ Scope of Criminal Conspiracy
Wide Ambit: Covers planning, coordinating, and even supporting illegal acts.
Includes Cyber, White-collar and Organized Crime
Can apply even if the main offense is not actually committed.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Examples:
Planning a terrorist attack (even if not executed)
Agreement to rig public exams using unfair means
Planning a financial fraud using shell companies
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π§ Essential Ingredients
Two or more persons
Agreement to commit an illegal act (or legal act by illegal means)
Common intention
Overt act (required only in minor offenses)
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Notable Features under BNS
Aligns with Section 120A and 120B of IPC, but made clearer.
No requirement of overt act in serious offenses.
Can be charged independently of the actual offense.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Conclusion
Criminal conspiracy under BNS, 2023 emphasizes the danger of collective criminal intention, even before the actual crime occurs. It is a preventive and punitive provision that targets preparatory and planning stages, especially in modern organized and cyber crimes.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π What is Criminal Conspiracy?
Under Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, criminal conspiracy is defined as:
βWhen two or more persons agree to do, or cause to be done β
(a) an illegal act, or
(b) a legal act by illegal means,
such an agreement is designated a criminal conspiracy.β
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
πΈ Key Point: Mere agreement is enough in serious offenses β no act needs to be committed to complete the offense of conspiracy.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
βοΈ Scope of Criminal Conspiracy
Wide Ambit: Covers planning, coordinating, and even supporting illegal acts.
Includes Cyber, White-collar and Organized Crime
Can apply even if the main offense is not actually committed.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Examples:
Planning a terrorist attack (even if not executed)
Agreement to rig public exams using unfair means
Planning a financial fraud using shell companies
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π§ Essential Ingredients
Two or more persons
Agreement to commit an illegal act (or legal act by illegal means)
Common intention
Overt act (required only in minor offenses)
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Notable Features under BNS
Aligns with Section 120A and 120B of IPC, but made clearer.
No requirement of overt act in serious offenses.
Can be charged independently of the actual offense.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Conclusion
Criminal conspiracy under BNS, 2023 emphasizes the danger of collective criminal intention, even before the actual crime occurs. It is a preventive and punitive provision that targets preparatory and planning stages, especially in modern organized and cyber crimes.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Abetment by aiding refers to:
Anonymous Quiz
20%
A) Provoking a person
65%
B) Offering support before or during the act
12%
C) Agreeing to commit a crime
4%
D) Concealing a criminal
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
What is proposal and offer?
Anonymous Quiz
49%
a. Both are same
37%
b. Both are different
12%
c. Either (a) or (b)
2%
d. None of the above
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
A person abets a crime committed by another. Who is liable?
Anonymous Quiz
7%
A) Only the principal offender
10%
B) Only the abettor
83%
C) Both the abettor and principal offender
0%
D) Neither
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
π§Ύ Attempt to Commit an Offense β Section 62, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
βοΈ Statutory Provision β Section 62, BNS 2023
βWhoever attempts to commit an offense punishable by this Sanhita with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offense to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offense, shall, where no express provision is made for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offense, for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offense, or with such fine as is provided, or with both.β
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Meaning of Attempt
An attempt is when a person intends to commit a crime and takes a substantial step towards it, but fails to complete it.
It lies between preparation and completion of the crime.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π§ Essential Ingredients of an Attempt
Intention (Mens Rea) to commit an offense
Execution (Actus Reus) β doing something more than mere preparation
Proximity to completion of the crime
Failure to complete the offense
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π§© Examples
Attempt to murder: Shooting a person with intent to kill, but missing the shot.
Attempt to rape: Physical actions stopped or resisted before completion.
Attempt to commit theft: Breaking into a house but caught before stealing.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Punishment under Section 62
Maximum punishment is half the maximum term for the full offense.
If the offense is punishable with 10 years, attempt may attract up to 5 years.
Fine or both can also be imposed.
Applies only where no specific attempt provision exists.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Illustrative Case (based on IPC, relevant to BNS)
Koppula Venkat Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004):
The accused removed the clothes of a girl but was stopped. It was held as an attempt to rape β he had the intention and had done acts toward committing it.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Summary
Section 62 of BNS punishes an attempt to commit crimes even if unsuccessful.
Focuses on deterrence and preventive action.
Reflects a shift toward punishing intention plus effort, even if crime fails.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
βοΈ Statutory Provision β Section 62, BNS 2023
βWhoever attempts to commit an offense punishable by this Sanhita with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offense to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offense, shall, where no express provision is made for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment of any description provided for the offense, for a term which may extend to one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offense, or with such fine as is provided, or with both.β
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Meaning of Attempt
An attempt is when a person intends to commit a crime and takes a substantial step towards it, but fails to complete it.
It lies between preparation and completion of the crime.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π§ Essential Ingredients of an Attempt
Intention (Mens Rea) to commit an offense
Execution (Actus Reus) β doing something more than mere preparation
Proximity to completion of the crime
Failure to complete the offense
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π§© Examples
Attempt to murder: Shooting a person with intent to kill, but missing the shot.
Attempt to rape: Physical actions stopped or resisted before completion.
Attempt to commit theft: Breaking into a house but caught before stealing.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Punishment under Section 62
Maximum punishment is half the maximum term for the full offense.
If the offense is punishable with 10 years, attempt may attract up to 5 years.
Fine or both can also be imposed.
Applies only where no specific attempt provision exists.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Illustrative Case (based on IPC, relevant to BNS)
Koppula Venkat Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004):
The accused removed the clothes of a girl but was stopped. It was held as an attempt to rape β he had the intention and had done acts toward committing it.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
β Summary
Section 62 of BNS punishes an attempt to commit crimes even if unsuccessful.
Focuses on deterrence and preventive action.
Reflects a shift toward punishing intention plus effort, even if crime fails.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Under BNS, abetment is punishable:
Anonymous Quiz
24%
A) Only if the principal offense is committed
66%
B) Whether or not the act is committed
8%
C) Only if done by three or more people
2%
D) When done outside India
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Proposal/offer is defined under which Section of Indian Contract Act, 1872?
Anonymous Quiz
57%
a. Section 2(a)
24%
b. Section 2(b)
13%
c. Section 2(c)
6%
d. Section 2(d)
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Which section of BNS defines βabetmentβ?
Anonymous Quiz
62%
A) Section 45
15%
B) Section 50
15%
C) Section 48
8%
D) Section 60
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
π§Ύ Changes in Classification of Offenses under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π What is Classification of Offenses?
In criminal law, offenses are classified based on seriousness, trial process and bailability. Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and now the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, classification helps determine:
Whether an offense is cognizable or non-cognizable
Whether it is bailable or non-bailable
Which court has jurisdiction to try the offense
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Key Changes Introduced in BNS, 2023
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
1. β New Classification Tables Introduced
Each offense is now clearly presented in tabular format in BNS, showing:
| Offense | Cognizable/Non-Cognizable | Bailable/Non-Bailable | Punishment | Triable by |
This enhances clarity for police, lawyers and judges.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
2. π Redefined Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses
Cognizable Offenses: Police can arrest without warrant (e.g. murder, rape, dacoity)
Non-Cognizable Offenses: Police need prior approval from Magistrate to act
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Changes in categorization:
Some offenses previously non-cognizable under IPC have become cognizable under BNS (and vice versa), depending on gravity and social impact.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
3. βοΈ New Bailability Structure
Bailable: Accused has the right to bail
Non-bailable: Bail is at the discretion of the court
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Reclassification:
Certain economic offenses and cybercrimes are now non-bailable, showing a policy shift toward stringency in white-collar crimes.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
4. π Trial Jurisdiction Clarified
Each offense is now assigned a specific level of court:
Magistrate of First Class
Sessions Court
Executive Magistrate (for community service or summary trial)
This brings uniformity and predictability in procedure.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π§ Why These Changes Matter?
Improves Police Efficiency: Clearer rules on arrest powers
Enhances Judicial Transparency: Well-defined trial structure
Protects Citizensβ Rights: Better classification prevents misuse of arrest powers
Focus on Serious Offenses: Cyber, economic and sexual offenses treated more stringently
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
β Summary
The BNS, 2023 marks a systemic improvement in how offenses are classified:
Better guidance for law enforcement
More fairness in legal procedures
Modernization aligned with current societal threats (e.g. cybercrime, terrorism)
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π What is Classification of Offenses?
In criminal law, offenses are classified based on seriousness, trial process and bailability. Under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and now the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, classification helps determine:
Whether an offense is cognizable or non-cognizable
Whether it is bailable or non-bailable
Which court has jurisdiction to try the offense
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
π Key Changes Introduced in BNS, 2023
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
1. β New Classification Tables Introduced
Each offense is now clearly presented in tabular format in BNS, showing:
| Offense | Cognizable/Non-Cognizable | Bailable/Non-Bailable | Punishment | Triable by |
This enhances clarity for police, lawyers and judges.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
2. π Redefined Cognizable and Non-Cognizable Offenses
Cognizable Offenses: Police can arrest without warrant (e.g. murder, rape, dacoity)
Non-Cognizable Offenses: Police need prior approval from Magistrate to act
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Changes in categorization:
Some offenses previously non-cognizable under IPC have become cognizable under BNS (and vice versa), depending on gravity and social impact.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
3. βοΈ New Bailability Structure
Bailable: Accused has the right to bail
Non-bailable: Bail is at the discretion of the court
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π Reclassification:
Certain economic offenses and cybercrimes are now non-bailable, showing a policy shift toward stringency in white-collar crimes.
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
4. π Trial Jurisdiction Clarified
Each offense is now assigned a specific level of court:
Magistrate of First Class
Sessions Court
Executive Magistrate (for community service or summary trial)
This brings uniformity and predictability in procedure.
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
π§ Why These Changes Matter?
Improves Police Efficiency: Clearer rules on arrest powers
Enhances Judicial Transparency: Well-defined trial structure
Protects Citizensβ Rights: Better classification prevents misuse of arrest powers
Focus on Serious Offenses: Cyber, economic and sexual offenses treated more stringently
https://www.tgoop.com/lawstuden
β Summary
The BNS, 2023 marks a systemic improvement in how offenses are classified:
Better guidance for law enforcement
More fairness in legal procedures
Modernization aligned with current societal threats (e.g. cybercrime, terrorism)
http://youtube.com/c/LAWEXPLORER
Forwarded from π LAW STUDENTS Β© π (ASIF ALI)
Attempt to commit an offense punishable with life imprisonment is punished with:
Anonymous Quiz
25%
A) Full punishment
29%
B) One-fourth of punishment
43%
C) One-half of the punishment
3%
D) No punishment