Trading Crypto Guide ™
#BTC started to dump after nearly goes near the $116,000 area. Price Now strongly dropping and this is concerning, but we a;ready mentioned it can go for wick fill in coming days. Just stay strong and wait for more clarity.
#BTC moving back and forth of the new support zone around $110,000. Price caught up in a little bound range and price action is messy and need to wait more for clarity.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
#BTC.D UPDATE : #BTC.D kept on rejecting the resistance area multiple times and also holding the trendline. In bigger picture, it on a key resistance area and making a triangle pattern too. Keep an alert on charts as it might break either side of zone and…
#BTC.D UPDATE :
#BTC.D had a clear break of the resistance zone and strongly push to the upside after a retest. We saw some altcoins suffered with very hard and high liquidation happened. Index again on the same level and need to see Daily Closing (Weekly closing will be better) will show a good sign for altcoins.
#BTC.D had a clear break of the resistance zone and strongly push to the upside after a retest. We saw some altcoins suffered with very hard and high liquidation happened. Index again on the same level and need to see Daily Closing (Weekly closing will be better) will show a good sign for altcoins.
ETF inflows have so far balanced LTH selling, but with little margin for error. Around the FOMC, LTH distribution surged to 122k BTC/month, while ETF netflows (7D-SMA) collapsed from 2.6k BTC/day to nearly zero. The combination of rising sell pressure and fading institutional demand created a fragile backdrop, setting the stage for weakness.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
Throughput Mechanics The throughput multiplication comes from parallel execution across shards combined with ZK proof compression. If Ethereum mainnet processes ~15 TPS and each shard achieves similar execution capacity, a 64-shard implementation theoretically…
zkSharding Benefits & Tradeoffs
Scalability 📈
Parallel execution removes scalability bottlenecks enabling linear throughput growth. Achieves tens of thousands of TPS with fewer than 500 nodes required - dramatically more efficient than traditional architectures.
No Fragmentation 🔗
- Security/Liquidity Unity: Each shard integrates into whole cluster eliminating bridges for cross-environment transfers. Single security model prevents weakened guarantees across fragments.
- Ethereum Liquidity Access: Transparent mainnet data access reduces need to migrate liquidity, keeping capital efficiently deployed across unified ecosystem.
Cost Efficiency 💰
Transaction costs significantly reduced vs Ethereum mainnet with potential sub-$0.01 fees making microtransactions economically viable.
Security Architecture 🛡
- zkEVM Compilation: State transitions secured by zkLLVM-compiled zkEVM providing auditable constraint security. High-level language compilation from production EVM implementation enables easy inspection vs manually-written circuits.
- Liveness Guarantees: Restaking existing pools (e.g., Lido) TVL ensures network liveness and economic security.
- Day-One Decentralization: Combination of Stake Market and Proof Market prevents centralized launch vulnerabilities.
Scalability 📈
Parallel execution removes scalability bottlenecks enabling linear throughput growth. Achieves tens of thousands of TPS with fewer than 500 nodes required - dramatically more efficient than traditional architectures.
No Fragmentation 🔗
- Security/Liquidity Unity: Each shard integrates into whole cluster eliminating bridges for cross-environment transfers. Single security model prevents weakened guarantees across fragments.
- Ethereum Liquidity Access: Transparent mainnet data access reduces need to migrate liquidity, keeping capital efficiently deployed across unified ecosystem.
Cost Efficiency 💰
Transaction costs significantly reduced vs Ethereum mainnet with potential sub-$0.01 fees making microtransactions economically viable.
Security Architecture 🛡
- zkEVM Compilation: State transitions secured by zkLLVM-compiled zkEVM providing auditable constraint security. High-level language compilation from production EVM implementation enables easy inspection vs manually-written circuits.
- Liveness Guarantees: Restaking existing pools (e.g., Lido) TVL ensures network liveness and economic security.
- Day-One Decentralization: Combination of Stake Market and Proof Market prevents centralized launch vulnerabilities.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
Choose a Coin For Analysis
Here's the Analysis of #CAKE :
#CAKE is been going through the strong supporting trendline kept on rejecting multiple times. Price dropped hard and cleared out the liquidity from the left and forming a head and shoulder pattern. Price is expected to reach near the support zone around $2.25 - $2.59, and buys can be taken along with that.
#CAKE is been going through the strong supporting trendline kept on rejecting multiple times. Price dropped hard and cleared out the liquidity from the left and forming a head and shoulder pattern. Price is expected to reach near the support zone around $2.25 - $2.59, and buys can be taken along with that.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
#BTC moving back and forth of the new support zone around $110,000. Price caught up in a little bound range and price action is messy and need to wait more for clarity.
#BTC is again back to the support zone as build and kept on dropping on that and rejecting it too. Still no clarity at the moment, need to wait for the break either side sooner.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
#TOTAL2 ANALYSIS (Altcoin Market Cap Index) : #TOTAL2 going very smooth and as expected too. Index sustaining over the resistance, printed the new ALL TIME HIGH after the a long consolidation / Triangle Pattern. Its still bullish, expecting much more to happen…
Trading Crypto Guide ™
Choose a Coin For Analysis
Here's the Analysis of #ENA :
#ENA strong rejecting the key support zones and candle closure also supporting those area. Now again price started dipping lower and in case of break of the support zone around $$0.35 - $0.38, we can take advantage of shorting it till next support zone around $0.26 - $0.28 or wick-fill too.
#ENA strong rejecting the key support zones and candle closure also supporting those area. Now again price started dipping lower and in case of break of the support zone around $$0.35 - $0.38, we can take advantage of shorting it till next support zone around $0.26 - $0.28 or wick-fill too.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
#BTC is again back to the support zone as build and kept on dropping on that and rejecting it too. Still no clarity at the moment, need to wait for the break either side sooner.
#BTC started crashing hard, we already told for a wick fill to happen and might continue fall lower. Every other coins are bleeding and might continue so further. Once close below we can go for $100,000 mark.
Last Week On-Chain Data Already Suggest that, Mild Profit taking happened.
Did you Sold you Bags in this Panic Move ?
Anonymous Poll
22%
Sold All
52%
Nope
11%
Partial Unloaded
21%
Liquidated All
Trading Crypto Guide ™
#BITCOIN DAILY TF UPDATE : #BITCOIN on Daily TF, had a clear Bearish engulfing and goes lower with a massive down move in the market, with trump news. A massive 16% drop in few hours, wiping out every random old lows. The Rejection also rejection from the…
Trading Crypto Guide ™
Here's the Analysis of #WLD : #WLD going throughout the range and broke below the consolidation range. The resistance zone is at $1.22 - $1.24, where price is going to have a retest. Price can still dip down with that retest and take small scalping there.
#WLD held the resistance line and we saw a very very strong down move. We go more than what we expected, unexpectedly. Price now forming a some new lower lows and now retesting the zone, if #BTC sustains below $108,000 / $110,000, then altcoins can further crash with that, so take it accordingly with additional confirmations.
zkSharding: Key Tradeoffs and Disadvantages
- Complexity Challenges ⚙️
Zero-knowledge proof generation adds significant computational overhead compared to simpler blockchain architectures. Generating cryptographic proofs for state transitions can take seconds to minutes, requiring specialized hardware and expertise. Cross-shard coordination further complicates the system—managing atomic transactions across multiple shards introduces coordination challenges, race conditions, and complex debugging scenarios absent in single-chain systems.
Developers face a steep learning curve, needing to understand ZK circuits, sharding protocols, and cross-shard messaging. This complexity extends to operations as well, with network operators managing shard health, validator rotations, and coordinated upgrades across a distributed architecture.
Validator Requirements 💻
Despite efficiency improvements, zkSharding validators still require substantial resources: multi-core CPUs, 32GB+ RAM, terabyte-scale NVMe storage, and high-bandwidth connections. Hardware costs ($2,000-$10,000+) plus staking requirements create economic and technical barriers that limit participation compared to ultra-light clients requiring just a smartphone. This concentrates validation among well-resourced operators, potentially creating geographic centralization in regions with premium internet infrastructure.
Novel Security Assumptions 🔍
Restaking existing stake pools (like Lido) for liveness introduces correlated risks—slashing events could cascade across multiple protocols simultaneously. Dynamic validator rotation prevents long-term collusion but creates timing attack windows and requires robust randomness. As an untested combination of ZK proofs, execution sharding, and restaking, zkSharding lacks the battle-tested security confidence of Bitcoin or Ethereum, requiring years of operation to reveal and patch vulnerabilities.
Network Effects 🌐
Competing against established L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync) with years of head start presents significant challenges. zkSharding must build developer tooling, documentation, wallets, block explorers, and testing frameworks from scratch while convincing projects to migrate from ecosystems with billions in TVL and millions of users. The chicken-and-egg problem—users follow apps, apps follow users—requires substantial incentive programs and flagship applications to overcome switching costs and established network effects.
- Complexity Challenges ⚙️
Zero-knowledge proof generation adds significant computational overhead compared to simpler blockchain architectures. Generating cryptographic proofs for state transitions can take seconds to minutes, requiring specialized hardware and expertise. Cross-shard coordination further complicates the system—managing atomic transactions across multiple shards introduces coordination challenges, race conditions, and complex debugging scenarios absent in single-chain systems.
Developers face a steep learning curve, needing to understand ZK circuits, sharding protocols, and cross-shard messaging. This complexity extends to operations as well, with network operators managing shard health, validator rotations, and coordinated upgrades across a distributed architecture.
Validator Requirements 💻
Despite efficiency improvements, zkSharding validators still require substantial resources: multi-core CPUs, 32GB+ RAM, terabyte-scale NVMe storage, and high-bandwidth connections. Hardware costs ($2,000-$10,000+) plus staking requirements create economic and technical barriers that limit participation compared to ultra-light clients requiring just a smartphone. This concentrates validation among well-resourced operators, potentially creating geographic centralization in regions with premium internet infrastructure.
Novel Security Assumptions 🔍
Restaking existing stake pools (like Lido) for liveness introduces correlated risks—slashing events could cascade across multiple protocols simultaneously. Dynamic validator rotation prevents long-term collusion but creates timing attack windows and requires robust randomness. As an untested combination of ZK proofs, execution sharding, and restaking, zkSharding lacks the battle-tested security confidence of Bitcoin or Ethereum, requiring years of operation to reveal and patch vulnerabilities.
Network Effects 🌐
Competing against established L2s (Arbitrum, Optimism, zkSync) with years of head start presents significant challenges. zkSharding must build developer tooling, documentation, wallets, block explorers, and testing frameworks from scratch while convincing projects to migrate from ecosystems with billions in TVL and millions of users. The chicken-and-egg problem—users follow apps, apps follow users—requires substantial incentive programs and flagship applications to overcome switching costs and established network effects.
Trading Crypto Guide ™
Choose a Coin For Analysis