ARPA-H is spooks biometrics backdoor to NIH-
Needs to be put down now ASAP.
@GOP
$B funding on a single line item!
#defundARPAH
Once they build staff and facility, they won’t go away. Kill the tick before it embeds!!!!
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/01/bidens-new-arpa-h-flexible-biomedical-funding-minimal-bureaucracy/
Needs to be put down now ASAP.
@GOP
$B funding on a single line item!
#defundARPAH
Once they build staff and facility, they won’t go away. Kill the tick before it embeds!!!!
https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/01/bidens-new-arpa-h-flexible-biomedical-funding-minimal-bureaucracy/
UncoverDC
Biden’s New ARPA-H: Flexible Biomedical Funding & Minimal Bureaucracy
Receiving little to no attention, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) modified its structure on May 24, 2022. Proposed by President Biden and approved by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Xavier Becerra, the agency announced its newly created…
Tonight is deadline to comment
[email protected]
SUBJECT LINE: Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session for WHA76
Take Action Now!
EMAIL:
EMAIL TO: [email protected] and to Congress (Senators and Member)
SUBJECT LINE: Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session for WHA76
EMAIL COPY:
As a U.S. citizen, I am opposed to giving the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) the authority to declare unilaterally a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and the power to mandate the United States’ response. The W.H.O. has no business dictating to us, for example: the use of vaccines and the prohibition of other treatments; vaccine distribution and supply; surveillance and tracking of U.S. citizens; the implementation of a centralized database and digital IDs to control travel or other activities based on vaccine status and/or other personal information.
Such intrusive decisions have the potential to violate our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. They must not be made by anyone wholly unaccountable to us, let alone foreign powers.
That is especially true of the W.H.O. — an unelected, unaccountable, international organization funded by public and private contributions from stakeholders with possible vested political or profit-driven interests.
The W.H.O. has a long history of poor management and implementation of large-scale international efforts — including most recently, the global Covid-19 pandemic. No democratic state should consider relinquishing its sovereignty with regards to its response to public health emergencies within its borders or without.
Please accept this written letter as a public record of my strong opposition to the amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and the International Pandemic Accord (a.k.a. Treaty) under consideration by the W.H.O.’s World Health Assembly.
Rather than giving the World Health Organization intolerable authority over our country, the United States must instead exit the W.H.O.
Spread the word
[email protected]
SUBJECT LINE: Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session for WHA76
Take Action Now!
EMAIL:
EMAIL TO: [email protected] and to Congress (Senators and Member)
SUBJECT LINE: Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session for WHA76
EMAIL COPY:
As a U.S. citizen, I am opposed to giving the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) the authority to declare unilaterally a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) and the power to mandate the United States’ response. The W.H.O. has no business dictating to us, for example: the use of vaccines and the prohibition of other treatments; vaccine distribution and supply; surveillance and tracking of U.S. citizens; the implementation of a centralized database and digital IDs to control travel or other activities based on vaccine status and/or other personal information.
Such intrusive decisions have the potential to violate our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. They must not be made by anyone wholly unaccountable to us, let alone foreign powers.
That is especially true of the W.H.O. — an unelected, unaccountable, international organization funded by public and private contributions from stakeholders with possible vested political or profit-driven interests.
The W.H.O. has a long history of poor management and implementation of large-scale international efforts — including most recently, the global Covid-19 pandemic. No democratic state should consider relinquishing its sovereignty with regards to its response to public health emergencies within its borders or without.
Please accept this written letter as a public record of my strong opposition to the amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) and the International Pandemic Accord (a.k.a. Treaty) under consideration by the W.H.O.’s World Health Assembly.
Rather than giving the World Health Organization intolerable authority over our country, the United States must instead exit the W.H.O.
Spread the word
People need to be behind bars.
Our tax money is consistently used against us to support corruption.
https://t.co/R17BvIW3uo
Our tax money is consistently used against us to support corruption.
https://t.co/R17BvIW3uo
www.brokentruth.tv
NIHgate
Why is the NIH concealing the covid vaccine spike protein links to cancer?
Please watch a Mother’s Day message from the Mama Bears-
https://rumble.com/v2nh5ni-moms-will-hold-the-line.html
https://rumble.com/v2nh5ni-moms-will-hold-the-line.html
Rumble
Moms Will Hold The Line
Mothers Standing for America and her Freedom.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It’s a battle between good and evil. Period.
Bilderberger 2023…..we are watching you
No wonder why unsafe drugs run through the FDA-
They are too busy using resources to cover up their negligence
https://twitter.com/us_fda/status/1660607064211701762?s=46
They are too busy using resources to cover up their negligence
https://twitter.com/us_fda/status/1660607064211701762?s=46
Actuaries don’t lie. Their existence depends on this data.
https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
Re: NIH FOI Case No. 58915
On August 29, 2022 I submitted a FOIA request to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), FOIA Office which was received in that office on September 1, 2022.
I requested:
(1) All email communications between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen for the time period 20th August 2021 to 31st May 2022.
(2) All email communications from/to Eric O. Freed containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang" in the body of the email.
In an email dated on 8/31/22, you amended and perfected item (2) to “any emails containing the word “Jiang” and any of the words “paper,” “expression,” “concern,” “retract,” or “retraction”.
The NIH FOIA Office conducted a search for records and located 490 pages responsive to my request. The office under Gorka Garcia-Malene chose to withhold all records in full pursuant to exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(4), and section 5.3 l (d) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 4 protects from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential. The records withheld are communications about the review process and content is confidential.
There is an important public health value to releasing these unredacted communications. These records document the decision making process behind how science regulates itself. The methodology used to establish a claim by Eric O. Freed of the NCI that a paper written by two researchers in Sweden was invalid. Many esteemed researchers have reviewed the data used to force a retraction at MDPI Viruses have expressed astonishment at the weakness of Mr. Freed’s Expression of Concern that served as a prelude to the retraction. Further, the authors of the paper faced severe retaliation with one even losing a permanent position despite having caved to the pressure to retract. Additionally, another study was recently published in conjunction with scientists from NAIAD that validates the findings of the researchers in Sweden.
The public health importance of the information contained in Eric Freed’s communications with a foreign agent (Oliver Schildgen) cannot be understated. This study revealed a link between various cancers and the COVID vaccine spike protein, with a heightened focus on female cancers like breast and ovarian cancer. If this cancer/vaccine link is valid, then delaying, obfuscating, or obscuring the release and review of this data is potentially a threat to national security.
Mr. Gorka-Malene and the NIH/NCI have failed to give sufficient weight to the public’s interest in disclosure. MDPI is a non-profit business entity in Switzerland which operates a collection of scientific journals. The damage from exposed ‘review process’ trade secrets will be non-existent unless the communications reveal evidence of malfeasance. “An informed public is the most potent of all restraints upon misgovernment[.]” Grosjean v. Am. Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 (1936).
@brokentruthTV
On August 29, 2022 I submitted a FOIA request to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), FOIA Office which was received in that office on September 1, 2022.
I requested:
(1) All email communications between Eric O Freed and Oliver Schildgen for the time period 20th August 2021 to 31st May 2022.
(2) All email communications from/to Eric O. Freed containing the phrase "expression of concern" or the name "Jiang" in the body of the email.
In an email dated on 8/31/22, you amended and perfected item (2) to “any emails containing the word “Jiang” and any of the words “paper,” “expression,” “concern,” “retract,” or “retraction”.
The NIH FOIA Office conducted a search for records and located 490 pages responsive to my request. The office under Gorka Garcia-Malene chose to withhold all records in full pursuant to exemption 4 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(4), and section 5.3 l (d) of the HHS FOIA Regulations, 45 CFR Part 5. Exemption 4 protects from disclosure trade secrets and commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential. The records withheld are communications about the review process and content is confidential.
There is an important public health value to releasing these unredacted communications. These records document the decision making process behind how science regulates itself. The methodology used to establish a claim by Eric O. Freed of the NCI that a paper written by two researchers in Sweden was invalid. Many esteemed researchers have reviewed the data used to force a retraction at MDPI Viruses have expressed astonishment at the weakness of Mr. Freed’s Expression of Concern that served as a prelude to the retraction. Further, the authors of the paper faced severe retaliation with one even losing a permanent position despite having caved to the pressure to retract. Additionally, another study was recently published in conjunction with scientists from NAIAD that validates the findings of the researchers in Sweden.
The public health importance of the information contained in Eric Freed’s communications with a foreign agent (Oliver Schildgen) cannot be understated. This study revealed a link between various cancers and the COVID vaccine spike protein, with a heightened focus on female cancers like breast and ovarian cancer. If this cancer/vaccine link is valid, then delaying, obfuscating, or obscuring the release and review of this data is potentially a threat to national security.
Mr. Gorka-Malene and the NIH/NCI have failed to give sufficient weight to the public’s interest in disclosure. MDPI is a non-profit business entity in Switzerland which operates a collection of scientific journals. The damage from exposed ‘review process’ trade secrets will be non-existent unless the communications reveal evidence of malfeasance. “An informed public is the most potent of all restraints upon misgovernment[.]” Grosjean v. Am. Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 250 (1936).
@brokentruthTV
Keep your “Pride” month. I think we all need a humility month!
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#victoryjoy at premiere of #pkandemic3